I liked the books kindof, absoloutely hated the movie though..<br><br><span style="font-size:150">Twilight is the BIGGEST bandwagon I have EVER seen.</span><br><br>People think it's cool to be obsessed with Twilight. That is a bandwagon. >.< I hate hate hate it.
<br><br>lmao so is Maximum Dash or whatever its called. <br>And you all thought you were unique for jumping off the Twilight wagon and reading another v.v.v.v.v.v.v popular book. <br>Honestly.
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
I haven't read many vampire books, but I feel is Stephanie Meyer is actually pladurizing(SP?) and everything, something would have been done. This has been out for awhile, and if anything was going to happen, it would have by now.<br><br>With the sparkling thing, they should have never done that. It did make them look like they were sweating, and they messed it up even more with the glistening sound. They did cut a lot out, but the movie was already some 2 hours long. <br><br>I would say, overall, Twilight is pretty good. It isn't the best, but it is great in some ways, not so great in others. Again, this is my opinion.
<br><br><br>She is plagiarizing though (also with it right above, whytf would you spell it pladurizing???.) You can link characters<br><br>For example<br><br>Armand:leader of the Theatre Vampires- Aro:leader of the Volturi<br>Claudia: centuries old, stuck in a child's body, malicious and sadistic- Jane (and Alec): centuries old, stuck in childrens' bodies, malicious and sadistic <br>(Theatre Vampires)-(Volturi)<br>Louis: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Claudia because she was suffering - Carlisle: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Edward because he was suffering<br><br>golden eyes is Anne Rice's vampires' thing<br>honestly.<br>And its so noticeable that it kills me she (SM) hasn't been sued yet.<br>Anne Rice is rather into writing very Christian novels atm
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
I haven't read many vampire books, but I feel is Stephanie Meyer is actually pladurizing(SP?) and everything, something would have been done. This has been out for awhile, and if anything was going to happen, it would have by now.<br><br>With the sparkling thing, they should have never done that. It did make them look like they were sweating, and they messed it up even more with the glistening sound. They did cut a lot out, but the movie was already some 2 hours long. <br><br>I would say, overall, Twilight is pretty good. It isn't the best, but it is great in some ways, not so great in others. Again, this is my opinion.
<br><br><br>She is plagiarizing though (also with it right above, whytf would you spell it pladurizing???.) You can link characters<br><br>For example<br><br>Armand:leader of the Theatre Vampires- Aro:leader of the Volturi<br>Claudia: centuries old, stuck in a child's body, malicious and sadistic- Jane (and Alec): centuries old, stuck in childrens' bodies, malicious and sadistic <br>(Theatre Vampires)-(Volturi)<br>Louis: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Claudia because she was suffering - Carlisle: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Edward because he was suffering<br><br>golden eyes is Anne Rice's vampires' thing<br>honestly.<br>And its so noticeable that it kills me she (SM) hasn't been sued yet.<br>Anne Rice is rather into writing very Christian novels atm
<br><br>I know people may seem like SM is ripping off of other peoples books... but well Twilight and the rest of the series has done much better than AR's so I guess SM did something that wasnt like AR right?<br><br>And if she didnt have the whole golden eyes or anything would anyone really call them vampires? Alot of people would be scrutinizing the fact that she doesnt know anything about vampires and that they should have golden eyes and all that... <br><br>So yeah thats just another side of things.. don't jump me please =]
I haven't read many vampire books, but I feel is Stephanie Meyer is actually pladurizing(SP?) and everything, something would have been done. This has been out for awhile, and if anything was going to happen, it would have by now.<br><br>With the sparkling thing, they should have never done that. It did make them look like they were sweating, and they messed it up even more with the glistening sound. They did cut a lot out, but the movie was already some 2 hours long. <br><br>I would say, overall, Twilight is pretty good. It isn't the best, but it is great in some ways, not so great in others. Again, this is my opinion.
<br><br><br>She is plagiarizing though (also with it right above, whytf would you spell it pladurizing???.) You can link characters<br><br>For example<br><br>Armand:leader of the Theatre Vampires- Aro:leader of the Volturi<br>Claudia: centuries old, stuck in a child's body, malicious and sadistic- Jane (and Alec): centuries old, stuck in childrens' bodies, malicious and sadistic <br>(Theatre Vampires)-(Volturi)<br>Louis: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Claudia because she was suffering - Carlisle: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Edward because he was suffering<br><br>golden eyes is Anne Rice's vampires' thing<br>honestly.<br>And its so noticeable that it kills me she (SM) hasn't been sued yet.<br>Anne Rice is rather into writing very Christian novels atm
<br><br>I know people may seem like SM is ripping off of other peoples books... but well Twilight and the rest of the series has done much better than AR's so I guess SM did something that wasnt like AR right?<br><br>And if she didnt have the whole golden eyes or anything would anyone really call them vampires? Alot of people would be scrutinizing the fact that she doesnt know anything about vampires and that they should have golden eyes and all that... <br><br>So yeah thats just another side of things.. don't jump me please =]
<br><br>nono, Vampire Chronicles were quite popular in their day. Interview With the Vampire film even had Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt in it.
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
I haven't read many vampire books, but I feel is Stephanie Meyer is actually pladurizing(SP?) and everything, something would have been done. This has been out for awhile, and if anything was going to happen, it would have by now.<br><br>With the sparkling thing, they should have never done that. It did make them look like they were sweating, and they messed it up even more with the glistening sound. They did cut a lot out, but the movie was already some 2 hours long. <br><br>I would say, overall, Twilight is pretty good. It isn't the best, but it is great in some ways, not so great in others. Again, this is my opinion.
<br><br><br>She is plagiarizing though (also with it right above, whytf would you spell it pladurizing???.) You can link characters<br><br>For example<br><br>Armand:leader of the Theatre Vampires- Aro:leader of the Volturi<br>Claudia: centuries old, stuck in a child's body, malicious and sadistic- Jane (and Alec): centuries old, stuck in childrens' bodies, malicious and sadistic <br>(Theatre Vampires)-(Volturi)<br>Louis: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Claudia because she was suffering - Carlisle: prefers to drink animals' blood, turned Edward because he was suffering<br><br>golden eyes is Anne Rice's vampires' thing<br>honestly.<br>And its so noticeable that it kills me she (SM) hasn't been sued yet.<br>Anne Rice is rather into writing very Christian novels atm
<br><br>I know people may seem like SM is ripping off of other peoples books... but well Twilight and the rest of the series has done much better than AR's so I guess SM did something that wasnt like AR right?<br><br>And if she didnt have the whole golden eyes or anything would anyone really call them vampires? Alot of people would be scrutinizing the fact that she doesnt know anything about vampires and that they should have golden eyes and all that... <br><br>So yeah thats just another side of things.. don't jump me please =]
<br><br>nono, Vampire Chronicles were quite popular in their day. Interview With the Vampire film even had Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt in it.
<br><br>They had alot of money to spend on the movie thats why they got cruise and pitt, but Inetview with the Vampire (36mil, Twilight made in the first day) and Queen of the Damned (35mil) together only made just over the 70mil Twilight made alone in the first weekend...<br><br>And I guess if you wanted to counter in price inflamitry, I dont think It would make much difference, I'm pretty sure over the past 5-10 years prices have only raise about $1-$2 here where I am... so yeah..
Twilight was horrible. I mean, seriously? And then they invade HT with all the Twilight stuff because apparently to everyone else it was a good movie. <br>It wasn't. The camera work sucked, the whole movie was more based on the romance then the vampire. And it wasn't like the book at all(expected). So seriously? Make the House of Night series into a movie, or, if not already, Stephen King's 'Salem's Lot.<br><br><br>Anne Rice is amazing. I've been meaning to get a few of her books.
"I am carrying all my hatred and contempt for power, its laws, its authority, its society, and I have no room for guilt or fear of punishment."-Diego Rios
Semper Fi.
I love you so much that I could fly to wherever you are and kiss you, then fly back and buy a new corset for WGW (woooo) <br><br>I am glad to be of service in your amusement : D *dips into a bow and takes off mad hatter's hat*
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
That Movie made me want to Cement Babies into Lawn Gnomes.<span style="font-size:59"> I promise I didn't though </span><br><br><br> :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Well I can agree with you. I'm not fond of Twilight what so ever. I truely hate it with a passion, even ask VP chat lol. I think I mainly don't like it because all the fangirls. Sparkling vampires, cheesy lines, Edward looking horrible, Venom and many more reasons, it all irked me to no end. <br><br> Especially the fan girls.<br><br> Anne Rice has the perfect vampires, in my opinion. They're deep, beautifully enriched vocabulary. She has it all. <br><br> Lestat for the win! Edward for the fail, but Edward is more romantic and human than Lestat. I will agree, Twilight is for tweens that want a romance like that. But in reality, them being so rabbid scare most of the boys away, especially if they're swooning over Edward who doesn't exsist. <br><br>I rest my case. Twilight is ok and that's the most I can say for the over-rated book. I just suggest to read Anne Rice's Interview with a Vampira and Queen of the Damned. They're great books with beautiful structure, inside and out.
"Discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in New Eyes."
If you want a REAL vampire movie (not that I had any issues with Twilight that couldn't be resolved lol) my aunt and uncle went to see underworld. It's even got werewolves lol. But it's like, rated R...
<br><br>What about Van Helsing? My parents love that movie. :?
Well I can agree with you. I'm not fond of Twilight what so ever. I truely hate it with a passion, even ask VP chat lol. I think I mainly don't like it because all the fangirls. Sparkling vampires, cheesy lines, Edward looking horrible, Venom and many more reasons, it all irked me to no end. <br><br> Especially the fan girls.
<br><br>lmfao. >.> Same here. XD
i know you're supposed to cherish life , but this crap isn't paradise .
love&&lifegaurds , mondy♥; .
Comments
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
15/100 mill
Semper Fi.
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
15/100 mill
(email/msn is now posted, so add me, but make sure to let me know who you are :] )
"Discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in New Eyes."
love&&lifegaurds , mondy♥; .