bloodlines.... (untrained) ...no....(trained)

Phelsuma · July 2008

i wonder if eny one has noticed but... when you viset a dogs bloodlines.. even if the dogs parents ARE trained.. it says its (untrained).i have looked at mainy dogs and have still yet to have seen (trained) next to the name. i think if the dog IS trained.. it should say (trained) insted of (untrained). peaple have looked at my pups bloodlines and siad well the parents are not trained. but lol, theywill have a HARD time finding (trained) parents.

AshleeBrooke · July 2008

Its because the coding was taken from VHR. And the horses are trained alot different on there.

Meeko1 · July 2008

So why don't we fix it then?

AshleeBrooke · July 2008

Been like that forever and not really bothered anyone I guess. o_o

sylverwynd · September 2008

I'd like it to say trained as well, if the dog is trained, of course.<br>And possibly further bloodlines?

Erra · January 2009

It really bothers me XD I just figured it was another of those things that would never be changed.

Aziu · January 2009

What would be considered "trained"? Since the code's from VHR, where horses have one discipline, how would that transfer? Skills? Most dogs are trained with 200/280 skill. Which skill would be considered the discipline? Just wondering - if this were to be changed, guidelines for defining a "trained" dog would have to be set. I'm pretty sure the coding to classify a "trained" dog as 280/200 would be more complicated than any benefit derived.

reina__ · January 2009

Stats 200%

TashaWasha · January 2009

Or perhaps if it's just removed altogether? <br>Just a thought. xD

Aziu · January 2009

That'd be my vote, if anything, Koshi. :P

UnknownDreamland · January 2009

<span style="font-size:75">I agree with Az and Koshi.</span>

Howdy, Stranger!

bloodlines.... (untrained) ...no....(trained)

Comments